By John Hawkins
Friday, September 21, 2007
Liberals love to think of themselves as intellectual and nuanced, but
liberalism is incredibly simplistic. It's nothing more than
"childlike emotionalism applied to adult issues." Very seldom does
any issue that doesn't involve pandering to their supporters boil down
at its core level to more than feeling "nice" or "mean" to liberals.
This makes liberals ill equipped to deal with complex issues.
Since liberals tend to support or oppose policies based on how those
policies make them feel about themselves, they do very little
intellectual examination of whether the policies they advocate work or
not. That's because it doesn't matter to them whether the policy is
effective or not; it matters whether advocating the policy makes them
feel "good" or "bad," "compassionate" or "stingy," "nice" or "mean."
Because of this, liberalism has more in common with religion than it
does with other political ideologies like conservatism or
libertarianism. Moreover, liberal beliefs are more like religious
doctrine than any sort of battle-tested policies that bear up under
logic or examination. Although the interpretation of the doctrine that
the Left supports may change a bit over time, just as religious doctrine
does, it's essentially taken on faith, like scripture.
That's why, for example, you may see ferocious debates on the right
side of the blogosphere about the war, illegal immigration, or spending.
But, with the netroots, the debates almost always revolve around the
best strategy to get more liberals elected. The issues are not really up
for debate, other than debate over how to get them enacted.
This same thinking leads to very little criticism of liberals by
other liberals. Liberals will ferociously defend and even happily echo
the lies of other liberals. Liberal feminists will defend Bill Clinton
and Ted Kennedy. Liberals who pride themselves on being tolerant of
other races will support Robert Byrd. Why? Because even if they're
wrong, they're still fellow liberals -- which must mean they’re nice
people. What this leads to is an attitude that can be summed up like so:
"The only things that a liberal can do wrong is to be insufficiently
liberal, to question an important plank of the liberal agenda, or to do
something politically that aids conservatives."
Conservatives, on the other hand, just by virtue of being
conservatives, are mean at best and evil at worst. Is it wrong to lie
about an evil person? Technically, "yes," but there's a reason "two
wrongs don't make a right" is said so often -- it's because so many
people do believe "two wrongs do make a right." Moreover, what about
defending the indefensible? Well, is it wrong to defend a good (liberal)
person who is being attacked by an evil (conservative) person, even if
it's justifiable? At the gut level, most liberals don't think so.
Once you understand what I've written so far, you can understand
everything that liberals do.
* Why are so many liberals hostile to religion? Because religion sets
rules and tells people that if they break those rules, they're sinning!
That keeps people from doing things that make them feel good and telling
people that they're sinning makes them feel bad.
* Why are so many liberals hostile to the troops? Because the troops
tend to be conservative (evil) and because they're out killing people
and breaking things (which would make most liberals feel like bad
people).
* Why are so many liberals unpatriotic? It makes liberals feel
morally superior to rant about what's wrong with their own country.
Plus, as an added bonus, people from other nations agree with them and
that makes them feel good as well.
* Why do so many liberals have so much confidence in the government?
With liberals, it's not about whether something works or not, it's about
how it makes them feel.
So, they can look at the IRS, post office, airport security, FEMA,
and ICE and then say, "These are the same people we want handling our
health care" -- because it's about making themselves feel good that they
got people insured, not about getting the best system of health care for
everyone.
* Why do so many liberals have so much confidence in the UN? See the
previous answer and apply it on a global scale. The UN may be corrupt,
anti-American, and utterly incompetent, but it makes liberals feel good
to think that they're sending money to the poor in some godforsaken
country (sure, it's not their money and almost all the money may be
wasted or stolen, but it's the thought that counts).
* Why are liberals so hostile to successful people who don't happen
to be celebrities, trial lawyers, or big donors to the Democratic Party?
Again, this is another great opportunity for them to feel morally
superior. They can feel like good people because they want to give money
to the poor -- granted, not their money, but rich people's money. The
rich have so much and the poor have so little, so why shouldn't liberals
take it from them and then pat themselves on the back for their
compassion?
Once you understand the basics of how liberals think, you can
understand everything that they do. Granted, there will be a few
exceptions, but if the vast herd of liberals is doing something that
doesn't seem to fit the template, it's either because there's money or
sex involved, they're doing what they have to do to win politically,
they’re taking that position because they refuse to be on the same side
as conservatives, or there's something going on you don't know about and
it's not really an exception.
You've heard of the Dog Whisperer, right? Well, congrats,
because after reading this column, you are now a "liberal whisperer" and
you understand everything you need to know about the way that liberals
think.
|