Dissecting Liberals
Burt Prelutsky
Monday, September 08, 2008If at times,
it is not easy to determine what a liberal is, it’s because during
presidential election campaigns, politicians who have been voting like
liberals, talking like liberals and boasting about their liberal
credentials, suddenly insist that they’re really centrists as they go
about trying to garner the votes of gullible Republicans and
Independents. It’s rather like Michelle Obama trying to convince us that
she’s just another stay-at-home mom who loves America and her kids, and
in exactly that order.
Most of us on the right can spot a liberal a mile away, just as
easily as experienced bird watchers can identify cuckoos, parrots and
pigeons. But just in case you’re not as proficient at recognizing the
odd ducks that populate the left, allow me to be your guide through the
wilderness.
In America, more than 80% of African-American and Jewish voters can
be safely assumed to favor liberals in any and all elections. The reason
that poor blacks vote overwhelmingly for Democrats is because they have
been told over and over again by plantation owners like Ted Kennedy,
John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, that it’s only through the federal
government’s largesse that they can manage to survive at all. I suppose
even if an able-bodied person is told from childhood on that he lacks
the ability to walk, let alone run, he will come to believe he needs a
wheelchair or at least a pair of crutches.
Middle-class, church-attending, blacks often owe their unnatural
allegiance to the party of George Wallace, Strom Thurmond and Robert
Byrd, because they listen to their ministers. Political bribes are
usually frowned upon, except when the Democrats act as bagmen for the
black clergy. There is a reason, you know, why white politicians get to
spend so much time in black churches at election time, in spite of their
insistence that “separation of church and state” is writ large somewhere
in the Constitution.
When it comes to Jews, the great majority of us are secular when it
comes to religion, but religious when it comes to leftist politics. It
isn’t a coincidence that Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky started out as Jews,
and that 39 of 42 Jews currently serving in the House and Senate are
left-wingers who, while disparaging Christian belief in Jesus as the
messiah, have no problem whatsoever accepting Barack Obama in that role.
I happen to know a Jewish professor who lives in the Pacific
Northwest. While he may not be typical, his mindset isn’t all that
different from many of my fellow Jews. When George Bush was running for
re-election in 2004, Professor Sandy sent me an e-mail in which he
claimed that if Bush won, America would immediately begin building
concentration camps for Jews, and he was glad he lived close to Canada
and would be able to escape across the border.
Most liberals will tell you that they don’t hate America, they merely
hate George Bush. But when you ask them why they hate him so much, they
start yammering about the invasion of Iraq, even though all the
Democratic bigwigs spent the 1990s calling for regime change, and later
voted for the invasion. The left also hates Bush because of the Patriot
Act. They insist it’s cost us many of our basic freedoms. But I have yet
to ask a liberal to name a single freedom he had under Clinton that he
doesn’t have today and received a coherent answer. Yet, even I can come
up with one. Thanks to Jimmy Carter, who allowed the Islamic crazies to
get a foothold in Iran by turning his back on the Shah, and Bill
Clinton, who spared Osama bin Laden’s life on more than one occasion, I
no longer have the freedom to arrive at an airport half an hour before
boarding and expect to make my flight.
There is a good reason, though, that liberals are liberals. By and
large, they are people who never fully mature and who go through life,
like sullen teenagers, resenting figures of authority -- be they police
officers, members of the military, teachers who believe in discipline
and academic standards in the classroom – people, in short, who have
rules and values. These folks started out by resenting their parents,
assuming their parents were responsible adults and not aging hippies,
the sort of parents who set curfews and expected good grades, parents
who objected to their offspring boozing, shacking up and using drugs.
For years, we have all heard Hollywood’s most prominent left-wingers
vow to leave America if we assorted racists, fascists and evil yokels,
managed to elect a Republican president. And although Republicans have
won five of the last seven presidential elections, and in spite of my
standing offer to drive any and all of them to the airport, in all that
time the only movie star who has left America except to make a movie or
work on his tan is Johnny Depp, who moved to France. Sean Penn and Robin
Williams did the next best thing. They moved to San Francisco.
One of the most annoying things about liberals is that when
nightmarish events don’t take place as they predicted -- be they
concentration camps for Jews, cataclysmic hurricanes or rising sea
levels -- they never admit they were mistaken. They can’t even bring
themselves to acknowledge that global warming was a hoax concocted by Al
Gore; instead, they merely start squawking like a barnyard full of
Chicken Littles about the intentionally vague phenomenon known as
climate change.
In the meantime, Nancy Pelosi turns off the lights in the House so
that Congress can’t vote for increased oil drilling. Then, to compound
matters, she takes time off from her book tour to go on “Meet the Press”
with liberal shill Tom Brokaw and explain that her personal financial
investment in natural gas exploration was simply a means by which to
wean Americans away from our dependence on hydrocarbons. Brokaw, either
because he didn’t know or, more likely, had no intention of embarrassing
Madame Speaker, neglected to point out that natural gas is a
hydrocarbon!
By the way, in keeping with the times, I’m Burt Prelutsky and I
approve this message.
Copyright © 2008 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.
|