| Written by Alex Alexiev
|
| Tuesday, 08 December 2009 |
As the illustrious conclave of global warming true believers,
led by President Barack Hussein Obama, gathers in Copenhagen for
yet another exercise in environmental doom and gloom, observing
the proceedings with the sly smirk of somebody who's "been
there, done that" is likely to be the ghost of one Trofim
Denisovich Lysenko (1898-1976).
No ordinary ghost that one either, for Comrade Lysenko was
Stalin's favorite scientist for decades and the driving force
behind the greatest scientific fraud in history prior to
"anthropogenic global warming." Indeed, to fully understand the
nature, magnitude and implications of the AGW scam, it's
worthwhile to revisit Academician Lysenko's exploits, which just
happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the charlatanism
currently on display in Climategate.
The 1950 edition of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia, the arbiter
and repository of all politically correct communist knowledge,
had the following entry under genetics: "Soviet scientists under
the leadership of Academician Lysenko proved scientifically that
genes do not exist in nature."
Denying that Mendelian genetics was a science and having it
outlawed it in the Soviet Union was probably Lysenko's crowning
achievement, but it is instructive to see how and why he was
able to do that.
A self-taught agronomist, Lysenko early on jumped on the
Stalinist bandwagon and developed a number of dubious
agricultural ideas that had one huge political advantage in that
they rejected all established science as "bourgeois" and
therefore "counter-revolutionary," an approach similar to the
Nazis" assault on "Jewish mathematics."
Included were promises to dramatically raise grain yields
through the practice of something called "vernalization", to
change the climate of Siberia by planting trees and make wheat
plants produce rye among others. To push these fraudulent ideas,
Lysenko resorted to politics by calling his opponents at the
time "wreckers" and the mere discussion, let alone disagreement
with his theories, "political sabotage."
Invariably these ‘saboteurs" lost their jobs and livelihoods if
they were lucky or landed in the Gulag and perished if they were
not. Today's global warming "deniers", the modern equivalent to
Lysenko's ‘saboteurs", would easily recognize all these tactics
minus the Gulag, though some of our latter-day Lysenkos have
called for legal prosecution of skeptics as well.
Thus, despite a well-known record of bogus research, experiment
falsification and faked results, with Stalin's
blessing, Lysenko and Lysenkoism ruled Soviet agricultural
science for three decades with dismal consequences for
agriculture and the country at large. While pre-Lysenko Russia
was once known as the granary of Europe, the Soviet Union was
never able to feed its population and relied on huge grain
imports until its demise.
Given this record of failure, why was this charlatan tolerated
for years even after Stalin's death? The answer to that is
simple. Lysenko may have been a fraud as a scientist, but he was
a communist scientist par excellence and that's all that
mattered. Communist ideology, just like Nazi ideology, required
strict obedience to partisanship in all realms and science was
not an exception.
And here Lysenko's contribution was impressive. By denying
genetics and propounding the idea that acquired characteristics
are inheritable, he provided the ‘scientific" underpinning of
Marx's theory that after a few generations of communist
dictatorship, a new selfless and docile communist man - a
perfect ant in an anthill - would emerge from whom the state can
take according to his abilities and give according to his needs.
It is here that Lysenkoism's resemblance to AGW is most
striking. Just as the former was only tangentially about
agriculture, the latter is not really about climate. Like many
other previous campaigns against imaginary evils like acid rain,
overpopulation, urban sprawl etc., its real target is
capitalism, the free enterprise system and individual rights.
Its solution is the unrestricted primacy of government over the
citizen and of collectivism over individual rights.
The objective is the same age-old socialist dream of the left
under a new and more seemingly benign guise. This new direction
was best framed by the American academic socialist, Robert
Heilbronner, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when, while
lamenting the fall of communism and the socialist economic
model, he urged his fellow leftists to use the ecological
movement to impose socialism and central planning through the
back door.
This has indeed proven to be sound advice and today radical
environmentalism has become the ramming rod of the
anti-capitalist left and a vastly more effective
instrument for undermining markets and free societies than
socialist ideology was ever capable of being.
In this scheme of things, anthropogenic global warming has
become for its supporters what Lysenko's theory of heredity was
for the Stalinists. For its small international cabal of top AGW
functionaries, it was about more than money, power and prestige,
though, with the connivance of sycophantic Western governments
and U.N. bureaucrats, there was plenty of that too.
It was about ideology. In the name of which, they were perfectly
prepared to dissemble, falsify records, destroy others' careers
and imperil their own. And their pseudo-scientific edifice,
built with so much underhanded effort over the years will not go
down without a fight as Copenhagen's confab will undoubtedly
prove.
For the leftist zealots who run AGW and their supporters in
government and academia know well that the unraveling of the
global warming scam may well be the beginning of the end of
radical environmentalism as the most promising means yet to
destroy the hated free enterprise system.
Consider, for a minute, how closely the various ongoing assaults
on capitalism in the United States depend on AGW for their own
viability. The minute it is proven conclusively to be a
fabrication, the rationale for government takeover of the energy
sector via cap & trade disappears, as does the raison d'etre for
taxpayer-subsidized renewable energy fantasies or the efforts to
undermine Americans' property rights through ‘smart growth" land
use restrictions.
Or think of the likely impact of proven malfeasance by the AGW
mandarins on their allies in U.S. government agencies, like EPA
and NASA, who have almost certainly engaged in similar dishonest
practices. They are already circling the wagons and, given the
support of the Obama Administration and the mainstream OPM
media, it is premature to write the mandarins off quite yet.
Nonetheless, what looked as an impregnable AGW fortress
a while ago has been breached and appears shaken and
vulnerable and Copenhagen will not change that. With China and
India not willing to join in the global warming demagoguery of
the West, no agreement worth the paper it's written on is likely
to come out of it.
In the meantime, with new Climategate investigations, FOIA
requests galore and almost daily revelations of the disingenuous
shenanigans of the environmental zealots and their government
supporters, it no longer looks outlandish to imagine the AGW
scam put to rest once and for all, as Comrade Lysenko has been.
Alex Alexiev is a visiting fellow at the Hudson Institute in
Washington DC.
|
|