| Written by Jack Kelly
|
| Friday, 02 March 2007 |
It doesn't take much to be the funniest moment in an Academy
Awards show that Washington Post television critic Tom Shales
described as "alternately a bore and a horror."
But I thought it hilarious when Algore won the Oscar for best
documentary for "An Inconvenient Truth."
Documentaries ought to bear some relationship to reality. "An
Inconvenient Truth" is a cheesy propaganda film. Dr. Richard
Lindzen of the Massachussetts Institute of Technology, who is to
climate science what Tom Brady is to football, has described it
as "shrill alarmism."
The thesis of Mr. Algore's movie is that man-made global warming
threatens catastrophe if we don't take steps immediately to
ameliorate it. It's a respectable thesis. A large number of
the world's climate professionals believe it, as the forthcoming
report of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
indicates.
But Mr. Algore takes it to a point beyond parody. "Nearly every
significant statement Algore makes about climate science or
climate policy is either one sided, misleading, exaggerated,
speculative or wrong," says Marlo Lewis of the Competitive
Enterprise Institute.
For instance, the IPCC predicts sea levels could rise by 7 to 23
inches in the next 100 years if concentrations of carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere double. Mr. Algore talks about a sea rise of
20 feet, which should say all that needs to be said about his
credibility.
Mr. Algore blames hurricanes on global warming. But Dr. Max
Mayfield, director of the Hurricane Center in Miami, said global
warming had nothing to do with the recent increase in hurricanes
in the North Atlantic.
Dr. Tad Murty, a hurricane specialist at the University of
Ottawa, notes that in the world's other six ocean basins,
hurricane activity is flat or declining. If global warming
hypothesis were true, said Dr. Tim Ball, a former professor of
climatology, severe weather incidents should diminish, because
the contrast in temperature between warmer and colder regions --
the driver of extreme weather -- would lessen.
Mr. Algore blames the loss of the snow cap on Mount Kilimanjaro
in Africa on global warming. But temperatures at the top of the
mountain have been falling, not rising. The snow cap has been
shrinking because of the loss of moisture in the air, due
chiefly to changes in land use at the base of the mountain.
"Algore's movie substitutes vivid images of the alleged effects
of global warming for an accurate account of the scientific
debate," wrote Joe Bast of the Heartland Institute. "We see
glaciers calving into the sea, giant storms sweeping through
resort areas, burning deserts, and even a cartoon polar bear
swimming aimlessly, searching for a place to rest."
The problem, Mr. Bast said, is that "all of the events pictured
in this movie have been occurring since before human activities
could possibly have caused them. Glaciers have calved into the
seas for millions of years, storms obviously predate modern
civilization and our emissions, and real-life polar bears know
better than to head out into the open water during the Arctic
summer."
For the record, the polar bear population is not declining, and
the ice caps in Greenland and Antarctica are thickening.
But Mr. Algore's Chicken Little film obviously struck a
responsive chord with the Hollywood crowd.
"You'd think that a science-based, call to action film from a
guy who flunked out of divinity school...would be received with
a certain amount of skepticism, but in officially atheist
Hollywood, Albert Arnold Algore Jr. is the second coming of
Moses, Maimonides, Martin Luther, all rolled into one," wrote
"David Kahane," a nom de plume for a screenwriter in Hollywood.
Algore-style alarmism is part scam and part theology. The big
monotheistic religions all predict an Apocalypse -- when an
angry God finally punishes mankind for our wickedness. Liberals
tend not to believe in God, angry or otherwise. But belief in
an apocalypse seems to satisfy some craving in the human psyche.
"When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in
nothing," said G. K. Chesterson. "They believe in anything."
When I saw the Hollywood celebs on the red carpet in their
tuxedos and designer dresses, I couldn't help but think of cave
men chanting around a fire as they prepare to sacrifice your
child to appease the thunder god.
That's your child, not theirs. For liberals, sacrifices are
something other people make. If the first steps taken to combat
global warming were a ban on private jets and limousines,
support for Mr. Algore in Hollywood would melt as rapidly as he
(falsely) claims the glaciers in Greenland are.
Oh by the way - the Academy's vote for Mr. Algore's film was as
fraudulent as the film itself. All some 5,800 members of the
Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences get to vote on most
categories - but they have to request a special ballot to vote
on some. Less than 300 requested a ballot for Best
Documentary, meaning less than 5% of Academy members voted for
An Inconvenient Truth. |
|