By Craige McMillan
The lights of the Eiffel Tower will dim, as the high priests
of the fanatical global warming political movement "dot their
tees and cross their eyes" on the Inter-galactic
Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change report.
Let's take a guess at their conclusions, shall we?
- The situation is more dire than even we thought!
- It's all the fault of the West, but especially America!
- We're all going to die – aiech!
Yes, ladies and gentlemen: Buy your cave property now, before
the price escalates out of reach. Live in a constant,
comfortable 62 degrees Fahrenheit, while your neighbors cook
their breakfast eggs on their doorsteps, drop dead of skin
cancer, and of course bring about their own demise by running
their air conditioning, further stressing the power-grid and
leading to production of ever-greater levels of carbon dioxide.
The only unfairness in it all is that your friends and neighbors
will have such a short time to lament their sinful, consumptive
lifestyles.
Repeat your penance five times a day as you bow facing the
Eiffel Tower, praying from the Inter-galactic Intergovermental
Panel on Climate Change report. Your deliverance is assured,
although in your cave you may have to build a fire to cook your
breakfast egg.
Way back in the 1970s it wasn't global warming that was going
to kill us all – it was a new global ice age. At least that was
the consensus of the best science of the day,
as touted by Time magazine. And what did the world do to
respond to this crisis? Why, according to Time magazine, they
assembled an Inter-galactic Intergovermental Panel on Climate
Change:
"Indeed, it is to gain such knowledge that 38 ships and 13
aircraft, carrying scientists from almost 70 nations, are now
assembling in the Atlantic and elsewhere for a massive 100-day
study of the effects of the tropical seas and atmosphere on
worldwide weather. The study itself is only part of an
international scientific effort known acronymically as GARP (for
Global Atmospheric Research Program)."
Oh, I get it! It was the exhaust from "38 ships and 13
aircraft, carrying scientists from almost 70 nations" that
narrowly averted the impending ice age and saved the world, but
due to rounding error in their calculations, they overshot the
target and tipped the scales toward global warming. Oh, now it
all makes sense!
One of the more disappointing aspects of the global warming
hysteria is that so many of the mainline media's reporters and
editors seem either intellectually incapable or too lazy to
think through the hysteria and hot air packaged by the global
warming fund-raising industry and shipped to their desks, and
thus never question the credibility of a movement that does a
180 on its fundamental assumptions and research while in full
public view.
Also, doesn't it arouse your suspicion when the proponents of
one particular side of the science demand that their critics be
silenced? That's precisely what some in the global warming
priesthood are now calling for:
They want the American Meteorological Society to decertify any
meteorologists who openly question the science behind global
warming. Nice, huh?
I thought the job of scientists was to pursue the truth in
whatever direction it led them. But perhaps this is a natural
outgrowth of "your truth" and "my truth." Or maybe real
scientific truth is only to be found in the pot of funding gold
at the end of the rainbow.