Saturday, Nov. 15, 2003 10:44 a.m. EST
Intelligence Bombshell: Saddam Financed Lead 9/11
Hijacker
In a startling about-face for U.S.
intelligence officials, a bombshell memo released by the
Senate Intelligence Committee late Friday draws a direct
link between Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks, citing
evidence that Iraqi intelligence bankrolled lead 9/11
hijacker Mohamed Atta in the months leading up to the
worst terrorist attack ever on U.S. soil.
The previously secret 16-page memo, prepared by the
CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies, says Atta met
as many as four times in Prague with Iraqi intelligence
agent Ahmed al Ani prior to the 9/11 attacks.
In a staggering revelation, which offers an
overwhelming and compelling justification for the U.S.
attack on Iraq, the CIA memo says that, during one of
these meetings, al Ani "ordered the [Iraqi Intelligence
Service] finance officer to issue Atta funds from IIS
financial holdings in the Prague office."
Al Ani was captured by Coalition forces in July and
has reportedly denied to U.S. interrogators any meeting
with Atta. U.S. press reports on Iraq's role in 9/11,
however, have been notoriously unreliable and are often
driven by an agenda to undermine justification for the
war.
In excerpts first reported late Friday by the Weekly
Standard, the memo says that the CIA "can confirm two
Atta visits to Prague – in Dec. 1994 and in June 2000."
Data surrounding the other two meetings, on Oct. 26,
1999, and April 9, 2001, is described as "complicated
and sometimes contradictory."
Neither the CIA nor the FBI can confirm, for
instance, that Atta met specifically with Iraqi
intelligence.
However, the memo emphasizes that Czech intelligence
continues to insist that the meetings took place.
"Czech Interior Minister Stanislav Gross continues to
stand by his information," said the Standard, noting
that the memo cites five high-ranking members of the
Czech government who have publicly confirmed meetings
between Atta and al Ani.
Another point about the memo worth noting: Its
revelations are based not just on information obtained
by the FBI and the CIA, agencies whose pre-9/11
intelligence failures were legion. Instead, the memo
sources a variety of domestic and foreign agencies,
including the Defense Intelligence Agency and the
National Security Agency.
"Much of the evidence is detailed, conclusive, and
corroborated by multiple sources," the Standard said.
Another intriguing link between the 9/11 attacks and
Iraq comes from "sensitive reporting" on a
Malaysia-based Iraqi national named Ahmed Shakir.
Shakir is said to have "facilitated the arrival of
one of the Sept 11 hijackers for an operational meeting
in Kuala Lumpur (Jan 2000)."
Shakir's travel and contacts link him to a worldwide
network of terrorists, including al-Qaeda, the memo
reveals. Shakir worked at the Kuala Lumpur airport - a
job he claimed to have obtained through an Iraqi embassy
employee. As the Standard notes:
"The Iraqi embassy, not his employer, controlled
Shakir's schedule. He was detained in Qatar on September
17, 2001.
"Authorities found in his possession contact
information for terrorists involved in the 1993 World
Trade Center bombing, the 1998 embassy bombings, the
2000 attack on the USS Cole, and the September 11
hijackings. The CIA had previous reporting that Shakir
had received a phone call from the safe house where the
1993 World Trade Center attacks had been plotted."
Beyond detailing evidence tying Saddam to the 9/11
attacks, the blockbuster memo reveals 50 instances of
contacts between senior al-Qaeda officials and Iraqi
operatives – starting in 1990 and continuing right up to
March 2003.
Incredibly, the Bush administration has gone out of
its way to disparage reports of any Iraq-9/11 links.
Although Vice President Dick Cheney told "Meet the
Press" in September that evidence of a link is
inconclusive, President Bush shut the door on further
speculation a week later, telling reporters that U.S.
intelligence had uncovered "no evidence" of a Baghdad
role in the 9/11 plot.
In a further example of administration incompetence,
the Standard reports that "few people in the U.S.
government are expressly looking for such links. There
is no Iraq-al Qaeda equivalent of the CIA's 1,400-person
Iraq Survey Group currently searching Iraq for weapons
of mass destruction."